Many incoming college freshman don't know what they're getting into. This was the case for me. Because I had no one to discuss with and teach me what to expect from the college lifestyle I don't think I was prepared. If I could go back to my freshman year with the knowledge I know now, I think I would do things differently. I wanted to create a platform where my thoughts and ideas of college life could be shared and read by others. I also wanted to be able to answer questions and gain from the receivers of my information.
I am generally a shy person. This doesn't mean I don't have interesting thoughts. I may not speak out verbally but I do have opinions. This is why I enjoy blogging. Blogs allow me to write my thoughts and opinions down in any matter I choose and at any pace I choose. A blog post can be written in 1 minute or it could take hours to write. They allow me to spill my thoughts as they come to me. O'Reilly touches on this in his reasoning as to why blogging is a major feature of Web 2.0:
"If an essential part of Web 2.0 is harnessing collective intelligence, turning the web into a kind of global brain, the blogosphere is the equivalent of constant mental chatter in the forebrain, the voice we hear in all of our heads. It may not reflect the deep structure of the brain, which is often unconscious, but is instead the equivalent of conscious thought. And as a reflection of conscious thought and attention, the blogosphere has begun to have a powerful effect."
Because blogging allows me to organize my ideas easily and allows connectivity through commenting and sharing, I thought that a blog would be the perfect place to publish my digital media project on advising incoming college freshman and parents.
I used the blogging platform, Blogger to create my blog and organize my ideas. I chose this platform because it is popular, I had a bit of experience with it, and I liked the way it was set up. In my opinion, one of the greatest features of Blogger is that it is owned by Google and is therefore connected to the user's Google account. For example, I can create contacts, subscribe to other blogs, read those other blogs with Google reader, and search for other blogs with Google Blog Search with ease. Blogs created with Blogger are also conveniently viewable through mobile devices. This creation of an easy-to-read, mobile version of the service ("Software Above the Level of a Single Device") is another feature O'Reilly uses to define Web 2.0. Through the use of an RSS feed, users who follow my blog can get instant updates whenever I post something new. Again, instant distribution in the form of a stream can be considered a feature of Web 2.0.
I decided that for now, Facebook is probably the best means of advertising my blog on my own. As Boyd suggests, we are living in a time where our information is accessed through a stream. I can distribute my blog on my feed so my friends can access it through their streams. When I post the hyperlink I can tag friends of mine whom I know are going to be incoming college freshmen in the near future so that I can make a pretty good assumption that part of my audience was reached. I understand that by distributing through facebook, I will only be reaching a fraction of my audience. I am unaware of better options at this time, however. Tagging my brother (who will be attending college next fall) and telling him to pass it on to his friends seems to be the most attractive method of reaching my audience right now. Facebook is now designed so that often when someone "likes" or comments on something posted by "friend 1", the content will show up on "friend 2"'s feed even though the "friend 1" and "friend 2" aren't friends. This means that I could reach a large amount of incoming college students even if my brother didn't share but simply liked the post.
I feel that in my case, the success of reaching a large audience will be completely based on user distribution and sharing. I believe if incoming college freshman and parents appreciate my help and learn from my blog, the information will spread. I think that my blog could become a place of discussion among users. This participatory culture and participatory learning is discussed in more detail by Jenkins. I believe that the best case scenario would be if my blog eventually became a well known source for students and parents to gain knowledge, ask questions, and add input.
References:
O'Reilly, Tim. "What Is Web 2.0." O'Reilly Media. N.p., 30 Sept. 2005. Web. 20 June 2012. <http://oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html?page=1>.
"Web 2.0." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 20 June 2012. Web. 22 June 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0>
Suthersan, Vinod. "5 Best Blogging Platforms 2012." 5 Best Blogging Platforms 2012 ~ Internet Tech Column. ITechColumn.com, 21 Feb. 2012. Web. 20 June 2012. <http://www.itechcolumn.com/2012/02/5-best-blogging-platforms-2012.html>.
Gillmor, Dan. "Google Buys Pyra: Blogging Goes Big-Time." SiliconValley.com. N.p., 15 Feb. 2003. Web. 20 June 2012. <http://web.archive.org/web/20031008161432/http://weblog.siliconvalley.com/column/dangillmor/archives/000802.shtml>.
Pilgrim, Mark. "What Is RSS." Xml.com. O'Reilly, 18 Dec. 2002. Web. 20 June 2012. <http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/12/18/dive-into-xml.html>.
Boyd, Danah. ""Streams of Content, Limited Attention: The Flow of Information through Social Media"" "Streams of Content, Limited Attention: The Flow of Information through Social Media" N.p., 17 Sept. 2009. Web. 20 June 2012. <http://www.danah.org/papers/talks/Web2Expo.html>.
Jenkins, Henry. "Why Participatory Culture Is Not Web 2.0: Some Basic Distinctions." HenryJenkins.org. N.p., 24 May 2010. Web. 20 June 2012. <http://henryjenkins.org/2010/05/why_participatory_culture_is_n.html>.
References:
O'Reilly, Tim. "What Is Web 2.0." O'Reilly Media. N.p., 30 Sept. 2005. Web. 20 June 2012. <http://oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html?page=1>.
"Web 2.0." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 20 June 2012. Web. 22 June 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0>
Suthersan, Vinod. "5 Best Blogging Platforms 2012." 5 Best Blogging Platforms 2012 ~ Internet Tech Column. ITechColumn.com, 21 Feb. 2012. Web. 20 June 2012. <http://www.itechcolumn.com/2012/02/5-best-blogging-platforms-2012.html>.
Gillmor, Dan. "Google Buys Pyra: Blogging Goes Big-Time." SiliconValley.com. N.p., 15 Feb. 2003. Web. 20 June 2012. <http://web.archive.org/web/20031008161432/http://weblog.siliconvalley.com/column/dangillmor/archives/000802.shtml>.
Pilgrim, Mark. "What Is RSS." Xml.com. O'Reilly, 18 Dec. 2002. Web. 20 June 2012. <http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/12/18/dive-into-xml.html>.
Boyd, Danah. ""Streams of Content, Limited Attention: The Flow of Information through Social Media"" "Streams of Content, Limited Attention: The Flow of Information through Social Media" N.p., 17 Sept. 2009. Web. 20 June 2012. <http://www.danah.org/papers/talks/Web2Expo.html>.
Jenkins, Henry. "Why Participatory Culture Is Not Web 2.0: Some Basic Distinctions." HenryJenkins.org. N.p., 24 May 2010. Web. 20 June 2012. <http://henryjenkins.org/2010/05/why_participatory_culture_is_n.html>.
Author’s Name: Ryan Hill Reviewer’s Name: Greg Antrim
ReplyDeleteAssignment:
Does it meet the requirements?
1. Must have a Major Argument (underline it), introduction, and conclusion___X___
2. Contains a solid definition of Web 2.0/participatory culture___X___
3. Required in class and outside sources cited properly __X____- well done
4. All claims must be supported with concrete evidence__X____
5. Approximately 500-750 blog post ___755___
What do you recall from the course readings that are connected to what this person is saying?
He didnt touch on it, but the ability to comment on the blog, and answer questions or share information is one of the greatest features of a blog. Teaching freshman the ways of college through this medium is an excelent example of participatory culture (Jenkins)
Introduction:
The purpose is clear, and although the information in his project didn't relate to me, i can definitely relate to not being prepared for freshman year.
Paragraphs:
Which paragraphs are clearest and most interesting to read, and why?
• For the most part the paragraphs are all clear and engaging. The second last paragraph seems a little unnecessary, and more like filler than anything else.
Which paragraphs need further development?
• The second last paragraph and the conclusion could be expanded
Conclusion:
Does the draft conclude in a memorable way, or does it seem to end abruptly or trail off into vagueness? What suggestions do you have for improvement of their conclusion?
• Conclusion isnt really a full thought, try to expand on the other points youve made in the essay.
Overall Response:
What are the main strengths and weaknesses in the draft?
• Very good start. The essay is relatable and infomative. It uses concrete examples and cited sources to make the authors point. All it needs is a stronger conclusion
How does the draft connect to a larger social context?
• There are new incoming freshman every year, and there are several college students and graduates who have gone through similar experiences. It offers a good platform for consumption and production by several people.
What could be done to improve the draft?
• Stronger conclusion and a few more sources.
Author’s Name Ryan Hill Reviewer’s Name Kay Hendrickson
ReplyDeleteAssignment:
Does it meet the requirements? yes
1. Must have a Major Argument (underline it), introduction, and conclusion yes
2. Contains a solid definition of Web 2.0/participatory culture yes
3. Required in class and outside sources cited properly yes (needs works cited page)
4. All claims must be supported with concrete evidence yes
5. Approximately 500-750 blog post yes (821)
What do you recall from the course readings that are connected to what this person is saying?
Awesome citations of O'Reilly - features of Web 2.0. I don't know if this will completely fill the definition requirement... perhaps add a sentence defining Web 2.0 in your own words, then use the O'Reilly features to back up your definition (supporting your claim with concrete evidence at the same time!). Just a thought.
Introduction:
How does the introduction catch the reader’s attention?
Provides clear exigence for the project as a whole as well as for consideration of distribution outlets, and gives insight into your personality and motives. Think about rewording to make it more concise, but otherwise great intro.
Paragraphs:
Which paragraphs are clearest and most interesting to read, and why? Which paragraphs need further development? What kinds of information seem to be missing?
Clearest - 2 and 3. I'm still impressed with how you handled the O'Reilly citations by relating them to personal experience... kind of eases us into the material from the readings. Nice flow.
Most interesting - 4. Advertising on Facebook, how information disseminates there.
Further development - Concluding paragraph could use another sentence or two bringing the argument to a memorable close. What is the best case scenario when it comes to distributing your blog this way? It goes viral and gets a bazillion followers?
Other - I would delete the paragraph about finding a list-serv, but that's me. It is an option, but not a likely one and it doesn't really relate to your argument anyway.
Conclusion:
Does the draft conclude in a memorable way, or does it seem to end abruptly or trail off into vagueness? What suggestions do you have for improvement of their conclusion?
See suggestion above.
Overall Response:
What are the main strengths and weaknesses in the draft?
Strengths - personal yet informed tone, incorporation of readings
Weaknesses - works cited page?
How does the draft connect to a larger social context?
Distribution concerns everyone who produces content for an audience.
What could be done to improve the draft?
See suggestions above. Excellent draft, Ryan, I hope this feedback is helpful even though it's late!